On 08/14/2020 06:33 PM, cherif chibane wrote:
Hi Marcus,

Is there a copy of it somewhere that I can use, or do I need to recreate it? I have issues with Xilinx license for now.
____________
Cherif Chibane

Is there some special feature of that (AFAIR, old) FPGA image that is not available in the current one? Was it a custom image? If so, you'll
  need to recreate it.

Generally, if you try to use an older FPGA image with newer UHD, it's unlikely to work.

So, if you really need the older FPGA image, you would likely need to go back to an older version of UHD, and use uhd_images_downloader
  to fetch the images.

But again, unless there's some special feature that you were using from that image, the current-as-of-UHD-3.15 images should be just fine.



On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:31 PM Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com <mailto:patchvonbr...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 08/14/2020 06:29 PM, cherif chibane wrote:
    Hi Marcus,

    I am running UHD-3.15.LTS
    ____________
    Cherif Chibane

    The RFNOC image is the standard image now (even if you aren't
    using RFNOC at the UHD API level, the machinery in the X310 FPGA is
      based on RFNOC).

    So, you probably want:

    usrp_x310_fpga_XG.bit

    On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:21 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
    <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>
    wrote:

        On 08/14/2020 04:06 PM, cherif chibane via USRP-users wrote:
        Hello,

        I would like to use teh X300 bit
        file:|usrp_x310_fpga_RFNOC_XG.bit.|
        |Does it exist somewhere or do I need to re-create it? I
        used |uhd_images_downloader to download the bitfiles but it
        did not come with the files downloaded.
        Thanks,
        Cherif

        |
        |
        |Does it exist somewhere or do I need to re-create it. I
        used |uhd_images_downloader but it did not come with the
        files downloaded.
        ||
        Thanks,
        Cherif

        What version of UHD are you running?  I think the naming
        convention for the standard "factory" BIT files changed quite
        a while ago.


        _______________________________________________
        USRP-users mailing list
        USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
        http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com



_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to