On 01/13/2020 05:26 AM, Amrit Pal Singh via USRP-users wrote:
Hi All,

I am benchmarking the following commands on X310, B210 and N200 on UHD-3.14 version:

 1. usrp->set_tx_freq(tune_req, 0);
 2. usrp->set_rx_freq(tune_req, 0);

I am changing the frequencies inside a for loop for 1000 and 5000 times.
The code snippet is as follows:
    int count = 5000;
    uhd::usrp::multi_usrp::sptr usrp = uhd::usrp::multi_usrp::make(args);
    double start = usrp->get_time_now().get_real_secs();
    for(int a = 0; a < count; a++){
        uhd::tune_request_t tune_req = uhd::tune_request_t(800e6 + (a *
1e6), 0);
        tune_req.dsp_freq_policy = uhd::tune_request_t::POLICY_NONE;
        tune_req.rf_freq_policy = uhd::tune_request_t::POLICY_AUTO;
        //usrp->set_tx_freq(tune_req, 0);
        usrp->set_rx_freq(tune_req, 0);
    }
std::cout << "time:" << ((usrp->get_time_now().get_real_secs() - start)/count) * 1000 << "(ms)" << std::endl;

The following table summarizes the result observed with average time for a single frequency hops and the hop rate as well for both Tx and Rx.

X310 test       
        
        
        
No of hops Tx time (average) ms Tx Hops/second Rx time (average) ms Rx Hops/second
1000    0.0453756       22038.27608     0.0441415       22654.41818
5000    0.051013        19602.84633     0.0457056       21879.15704

        
        
        
        
B210 test       
        
        
        
No of hops Tx time (average) ms Tx Hops/second Rx time (average) ms Rx Hops/second
1000    3.34055         299.3519031     5.13762         194.6426555
5000    3.35529         298.0368314     4.94233         202.3337171

        
        
        
        
N200 test       
        
        
        
No of hops Tx time (average) ms Tx Hops/second Rx time (average) ms Rx Hops/second
1000    0.0530515       18849.6084      0.0504478       19822.46996
5000    0.0391015       25574.46645     0.037663        26551.2572


As observed, the rate is really slow for B210. I also tested using another B210 and it gave similar results.
Could anyone share any insights into these values.

Thanks,
Amrit

The AD9361 RF Front end used on the B2xx series isn't well-optimized for frequency hopping. The driver code does it's best to reduce tuning times as much as it can, but this is a hardware limitation of the RF chip used on the B2xx series.



_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to