Hi Rob, Yes, that's correct, you can use the WR-LEN with the X310.
Regards, Nate Temple On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:40 PM Rob Kossler <rkoss...@nd.edu> wrote: > Nate, > Although the X3xx series to not natively support White Rabbit, I believe > that they can get all of the benefits by using a WR-LEN in close proximity > to the X310. Is that correct? > > Rob > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:45 AM Nate Temple via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > >> Hi Akin, >> >> The Octoclock-G would be suitable for this purpose, and yes, it does >> contain a GPSDO (OCXO). https://kb.ettus.com/GPSDO#GPSDO_.28OCXO.29 >> >> The Octoclock-G does not contain an antenna, you must provide one to the >> GPS Antenna input (SMA). >> >> The X3xx series do not support IEEE 1588, however, the N3xx series USRPs >> do support White Rabbit, which is an extension of the IEEE-1588-2008 >> standard. More info can be found here on it >> https://kb.ettus.com/Using_Ethernet-Based_Synchronization_on_the_USRP%E2%84%A2_N3xx_Devices >> >> >> Regards, >> Nate Temple >> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:31 AM akin soysal via USRP-users < >> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> >>> I have a question. We want to synchronize the clock of the two USRP >>> X310s with a GPS or IEEE 1588 standard. I would like to synchronize the two >>> USRPs with each other so that the base station and user terminal would not >>> experience any synchronization issue. I also would like to synchronize one >>> of the USRP X310s with an external base station, which supports IEEE 1588 >>> and GPS clocks, and we have a synchronization budget of about *250us*. >>> >>> >>> I learned that the setup that worked in France is using the following >>> Ettus product: >>> >>> >>> https://www.ettus.com/product/details/OctoClock-G >>> >>> >>> Do you think that this would suffice for our needs? It has its own GPS >>> clock and antenna inside, right? It is compatible with USRP X310? >>> >>> >>> I know that the product specification does not include IEEE 1588, so I >>> am concluding that it would not be possible to use this standard for our >>> scenario, do you agree? >>> >>> Thanks and regards, >>> >>> Akın >>> _______________________________________________ >>> USRP-users mailing list >>> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> USRP-users mailing list >> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >> >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
