On 02/08/2019 01:31 PM, akin soysal wrote:
I tried setting it with the following command:
uhd_usrp_probe --args="master_clock_rate=184.32e6"
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609; Boost_105800;
UHD_3.13.1.HEAD-0-gbbce3e45
[INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
[INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes.
[INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock: 184.32 MHz
Master clock rate is a *PER SESSION* parameter! You need to specify it
in the device arguments of applications.
tx_samples_from_file -a "type=x300,master_clock_rate=182.32e6"
And then the rest of your parameters.
It seems to work in the beginning but when I repeat the previous
command, I see that master clock rate is set back to 200 MHz.
sudo ./tx_samples_from_file --rate 61.44e6
Creating the usrp device with: ...
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609; Boost_105800;
UHD_3.13.1.HEAD-0-gbbce3e45
[INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
[INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes.
[INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock: 200 MHz
Then I found the following useful thread, it was first said that only
200MHz is supported but then it was said that 184.32MHz is also
supported so I cannot be sure.
http://ettus.80997.x6.nabble.com/USRP-users-Clock-rate-of-x310-td9744.html
Is there a way to set the 184.32 MHz clock rate and if yes, is it
possible to set it as default?
Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:24 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>> wrote:
On 02/08/2019 04:37 AM, akin soysal via USRP-users wrote:
I am resending the mail to the forum so that everybody benefits.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: *akin soysal* <akinsoy...@gmail.com
<mailto:akinsoy...@gmail.com>>
Date: Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] USRP X310 Ubuntu 16.04 LowLatency
Timing Problems Possibly Because of UHD Drivers
To: Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com
<mailto:patchvonbr...@gmail.com>>
Hello Marcus,
OK, I tried, it seems the HW is not supporting the desired rate.
It is a NI CBX120 MHz daughterboard with USRP X310. Does that
make sense? I thought these sample rates were specifically for
this HW??
ulak@5g-NR-gNB:/usr/local/lib/uhd/examples$ sudo
./tx_samples_from_file --rate 61.44e6
Include "master_clock_rate=184.32e6" in your device arguments--the
default master clock is 200MHz, and 61.44Msps is definitely not an
integer
fraction of 200MHz...
Creating the usrp device with: ...
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609; Boost_105800;
UHD_3.13.1.HEAD-0-gbbce3e45
[INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
[INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes.
[INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock: 200 MHz
[INFO] [0/DmaFIFO_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xF1F0D00000000000)
[INFO] [0/DmaFIFO_0] BIST passed (Throughput: 1302 MB/s)
[INFO] [0/DmaFIFO_0] BIST passed (Throughput: 1313 MB/s)
[INFO] [0/Radio_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0x12AD100000000001)
[INFO] [0/Radio_1] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0x12AD100000000001)
[INFO] [0/DDC_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xDDC0000000000000)
[INFO] [0/DDC_1] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xDDC0000000000000)
[INFO] [0/DUC_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xD0C0000000000000)
[INFO] [0/DUC_1] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xD0C0000000000000)
Using Device: Single USRP:
Device: X-Series Device
Mboard 0: X310
RX Channel: 0
RX DSP: 0
RX Dboard: A
RX Subdev: CBX-120 RX
RX Channel: 1
RX DSP: 0
RX Dboard: B
RX Subdev: CBX-120 RX
TX Channel: 0
TX DSP: 0
TX Dboard: A
TX Subdev: CBX-120 TX
TX Channel: 1
TX DSP: 0
TX Dboard: B
TX Subdev: CBX-120 TX
Setting TX Rate: 61.440000 Msps...
[WARNING] [RFNOC] The requested interpolation is odd; the user
should expect passband CIC rolloff.
Select an even interpolation to ensure that a halfband filter is
enabled.
interpolation = dsp_rate/samp_rate -> 3 = (200.000000
MHz)/(61.440000 MHz)
[WARNING] [RFNOC] The requested interpolation is odd; the user
should expect passband CIC rolloff.
Select an even interpolation to ensure that a halfband filter is
enabled.
interpolation = dsp_rate/samp_rate -> 3 = (200.000000
MHz)/(61.440000 MHz)
[WARNING] [MULTI_USRP] The hardware does not support the
requested TX sample rate:
Target sample rate: 61.440000 MSps
Actual sample rate: 66.666667 MSps
[WARNING] [MULTI_USRP] The hardware does not support the
requested TX sample rate:
Target sample rate: 61.440000 MSps
Actual sample rate: 66.666667 MSps
Actual TX Rate: 66.666667 Msps...
Please specify the center frequency with --freq
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 5:18 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>
wrote:
On 02/07/2019 08:50 AM, akin soysal via USRP-users wrote:
Dear all,
We are trying to make the OpenAirInterface 5G SW work on our
own setup with NI USRPs. We are trying to use it with the
following configuration:
sudo ./benchmark_rate --args
"type=x300,addr=10.10.1.5,master_clock_rate=184.32e6"
--rx_rate 61.44e6 --tx_rate 61.44e6 --channels="0"
For different UHD versions we get different results.
Firstly, we know that the OAI setup in France is using the
following driver and gives the following output:
---
[0m[PHY] Checking for USRPs :UHD 003.009.007-0-g50839059(3.9.7)
[0m[PHY] Found USRP X300
[0m[PHY] ru_thread_prach() RACH waiting for RU to be configured
-- X300 initialization sequence...
-- Connecting to niusrpriorpc at localhost:5444...
-- Using LVBITX bitfile
/usr/local/share/uhd/images/usrp_x310_fpga_HGS.lvbitx...
[0m[PHY] ru_thread_prach() RACH waiting for RU to be configured
[0m[PHY] ru_thread_prach() RACH waiting for RU to be configured
[0m[PHY] ru_thread_prach() RACH waiting for RU to be configured
-- Setup basic communication...
-- Loading values from EEPROM...
-- Setup RF frontend clocking...
-- Radio 1x clock:184.32
-- Detecting internal GPSDO.... Found an internal GPSDO:
LC_XO, Firmware Rev 0.929a
---
We tried the same configuration, but we got errors:
---
ulak@5g-NR-gNB:/usr/local/lib/uhd/examples$ sudo
./benchmark_rate --args
"type=x300,addr=10.10.1.5,master_clock_rate=184.32e6"
--rx_rate 61.44e6 --tx_rate 61.44e6 --channels="0"
[sudo] password for ulak:
linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609;
Boost_105800;UHD_003.009.007-0-g50839059
Creating the usrp device with:
type=x300,addr=10.10.1.5,master_clock_rate=184.32e6...
-- X300 initialization sequence...
-- Determining maximum frame size... 8000 bytes.
-- Setup basic communication...
-- Loading values from EEPROM...
-- Setup RF frontend clocking...
-- Radio 1x clock:184.32
-- Detecting internal GPSDO.... No GPSDO found
-- Initialize Radio0 control...
-- Performing register loopback test... pass
UHD Error:
The daughterboard manager encountered a recoverable error in
init.
Loading the "unknown" daughterboard implementations to
continue.
The daughterboard cannot operate until this error is
resolved.
EnvironmentError: IOError: Radio ctrl (A) packet parse
error - AssertionError: packet_info.packet_count ==
(seq_to_ack & 0xfff)
in uint64_t radio_ctrl_core_3000_impl::wait_for_ack(bool)
at
/home/ulak/uhd/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/radio_ctrl_core_3000.cpp:264
Error: EnvironmentError: IOError: Radio ctrl (A) packet
parse error - AssertionError: packet_info.packet_count ==
(seq_to_ack & 0xfff)
in uint64_t radio_ctrl_core_3000_impl::wait_for_ack(bool)
at
/home/ulak/uhd/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/radio_ctrl_core_3000.cpp:264
---
By the way, we have bought CBX 120MHz daughterboards instead
of CBX 40MHz but would that actually create any problems? I
thought it is just the RF difference but maybe some
configuration is necessary from the drivers?
Then we downloaded and compiled the latest UHD version:
---
[PHY] UHD version3.13.1.HEAD-0-gbbce3e45 (3.13.1)
[PHY] Checking for USRP with args
type=x300,addr=10.10.1.5,master_clock_rate=184.32e6,fpga=HG
[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609;
Boost_105800; UHD_3.13.1.HEAD-0-gbbce3e45
Found USRP x300
Found USRP x300
[INFO] [X300] X300 initialization sequence...
[INFO] [X300] Maximum frame size: 8000 bytes.
[INFO] [X300] Radio 1x clock: 184.32 MHz
[INFO] [0/DmaFIFO_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xF1F0D00000000000)
[INFO] [0/DmaFIFO_0] BIST passed (Throughput: 1301 MB/s)
[INFO] [0/DmaFIFO_0] BIST passed (Throughput: 1309 MB/s)
[INFO] [0/Radio_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0x12AD100000000001)
[INFO] [0/Radio_1] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0x12AD100000000001)
[INFO] [0/DDC_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xDDC0000000000000)
[INFO] [0/DDC_1] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xDDC0000000000000)
[INFO] [0/DUC_0] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xD0C0000000000000)
[INFO] [0/DUC_1] Initializing block control (NOC ID:
0xD0C0000000000000)
[PHY] ru_thread_prach() RACH waiting for RU to be configured
[PHY] device_init() sample_rate:61440000
[WARNING] [RFNOC] The requested decimation is odd; the user
should expect passband CIC rolloff.
Select an even decimation to ensure that a halfband filter
is enabled.
Decimations factorable by 4 will enable 2 halfbands, those
factorable by 8 will enable 3 halfbands.
decimation = dsp_rate/samp_rate -> 3 = (184.320000
MHz)/(61.440000 MHz)
[PHY] cal 0: freq 3500000000.000000, offset 77.000000,
diff 2262291232.000000
[PHY] cal 1: freq 2660000000.000000, offset 81.000000,
diff 1422291232.000000
[PHY] cal 2: freq 2300000000.000000, offset 81.000000,
diff 1062291232.000000
[PHY] cal 3: freq 1880000000.000000, offset 82.000000,
diff 642291232.000000
[PHY] cal 4: freq 816000000.000000, offset 85.000000, diff
421708768.000000
[PHY] RX Gain 0 24.000000 (85.000000) => -61.000000 (max
37.500000)
[WARNING] [RFNOC] The requested interpolation is odd; the
user should expect passband CIC rolloff.
Select an even interpolation to ensure that a halfband
filter is enabled.
interpolation = dsp_rate/samp_rate -> 3 = (184.320000
MHz)/(61.440000 MHz)
---
Configuration is successful and we can run the code with it
but we get late packets in the beginning and end. Also
samples are missed every 50-100 ms.
---
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLD[PHY]
[recv]received 28728 samples out of 61440
L[PHY] rx_rf: Asked for 61440 samples, got 28728 from USRP
[PHY] problem receiving samples
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL[PHY]
[recv] received 0 samples out of 61440
LLLL[PHY] Time: 4.51512 s
ERROR_CODE_OVERFLOW (Out of sequence error)
[PHY] rx_rf: Asked for 61440 samples, got 0 from USRP
[PHY] rx_rf: rfdevice timing drift of -32712 samples (ts_off
212929711)
[PHY] problem receiving samples
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL[PHY]
rx_rf: rfdevice timing drift of 858716 samples (ts_off 212896999)
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
---
Our setup should be capable of running the SW, so it has to
be the UHD driver or the 10 GbE cable but we are using
optical fiber, so I do not think the problem is that either.
Then we tried another UHD version from the USRP X310
recovery page:
---
linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609;
Boost_105800;UHD_003.010.001.HEAD-0-gc705922a
-- X300 initialization sequence...
-- Determining maximum frame size... 8000 bytes.
-- Setup basic communication...
=========================================================
Warning:
Expected FPGA compatibility number 33, but got 35:
The FPGA image on your device is not compatible with this
host code build.
Download the appropriate FPGA images for this version of UHD.
Please run:
"/usr/local/lib/uhd/utils/uhd_images_downloader.py"
Then burn a new image to the on-board flash storage of your
USRP X3xx device using the image loader utility. Use this
command:
"/usr/local/bin/uhd_image_loader"
--args="type=x300,addr=10.10.1.5"
For more information, refer to the UHD manual:
http://files.ettus.com/manual/page_usrp_x3x0.html#x3x0_flash=========================================================
Error: RuntimeError: Expected firmware compatibility number
5.1, but got 6.0:
The firmware build is not compatible with the host code build.
Please run:
"/usr/local/lib/uhd/utils/uhd_images_downloader.py"
---
We get a different error after doing what is requested:
----
ulak@5g-NR-gNB:~/uhd/uhd$ uhd_usrp_probe
linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609;
Boost_105800;UHD_003.010.001.HEAD-0-gc705922a
-- X300 initialization sequence...
-- Determining maximum frame size... 8000 bytes.
-- Setup basic communication...
-- Loading values from EEPROM...
-- Setup RF frontend clocking...
-- Radio 1x clock:200
-- [DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 0... pass (Throughput:
1304.1MB/s)
-- [DMA FIFO] Running BIST for FIFO 1... pass (Throughput:
1305.1MB/s)
-- [RFNoC Radio] Performing register loopback test... pass
-- [RFNoC Radio] Performing register loopback test... pass
-- [RFNoC Radio] Performing register loopback test... pass
-- [RFNoC Radio] Performing register loopback test... pass
Error: LookupError: KeyError: Unknown settings register
name: CORDIC_FREQ
----
Your help would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Akın
Start by using a simpler program to diagnose the basics. .
Use something like tx_samples_from_file at your desired
rates (or tx_waveforms). Do those work? The problem with
using full-up complex
applications for problem diagnosis is that they don't
actually tell you very much--it's hard to decompose.
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
