Hi Rob,

Martin meant that the product ID issue was fixed in 3.12.0.1 (current head
of UHD-3.12) and 3.13.0.0.  We are currently trying to reproduce the TX
corruption issue using the head of UHD-3.13.

Regards,
Michael

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Martin Braun via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> On 08/15/2018 11:46 AM, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote:
> > Anyone know the cause & solution to the following startup error?  This
> > just started today after a cascade of problems which ultimately required
> > me to reflash the SD card.
> >
> > $ uhd_usrp_probe --args="addr=192.168.61.2"
> > [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 5.4.0 20160609; Boost_105800;
> > UHD_3.13.0.1-0-g5b236772
> > [INFO] [MPMD] Initializing 1 device(s) in parallel with args:
> > mgmt_addr=192.168.61.2,type=n3xx,product=n310,serial=
> 315A34B,claimed=False,addr=192.168.61.2
> > [INFO] [MPM.PeriphManager] init() called with device args
> > `mgmt_addr=192.168.61.2,product=n310'.
> > [ERROR] [RPC] RuntimeError: AD9371 product ID does not match expected
> > ID! Read: 1 Expected: 3
> > [ERROR] [MPM.RPCServer] init() failed with error: RuntimeError: AD9371
> > product ID does not match expected ID! Read: 1 Expected: 3
> > Error: RuntimeError: Error during RPC call to `init'. Error
> > message:RuntimeError: AD9371 product ID does not match expected ID!
> > Read: 1 Expected: 3
>
> This particular issue was fixed in 3.12.0.1.
>
> -- M
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to