Hi, Derek.Thanks for detailed answer.I'm using ubuntu 14.04 and kernel version 
4.2.0-42-generic and USRP X300 with two UBX-160 which is connected to the host 
PC via 1G ethernet.In my application, the lowest delta value that works 
reliably is 20ms. The definition of reliability means that there is no 'L' for 
one minute during the execution of the application.I want the delta value to be 
3~4 ms.so, since the problem is latency in OS side, I cannot improve the delta 
value even if I upgrade my host PC to good one. Am I right?the number of thread 
in the application may affect the latency? My application use two thread only. 
Since there are 4 cores in my host PC, I believe it barely affects the 
latency.To sum it up, to achieve 3~4 ms delta value (based on your delta 
value(5~20ms), I believe 3~4ms delta can be achieved), I should change the OS 
in the host PC to low latency linux kernel.Please correct me if I'm wrong. 
Thanks again!
-----------------------Original Message-----------------------From: Derek Kozel 
<derek.ko...@ettus.com>To: Hojoon Yang <omnibu...@kaist.ac.kr>CC: usrp-users 
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>Sent date: 2018-07-05 22:11:03 GMT +0900 
(ROK)Subject: Re: [USRP-users] timed transmission LATE issue
 
 
  
   
    
     
      
       Hello Hojoon,
       
       
      You will have to profile your system to determine the minimum delta that 
works reliably on your system, as well as choosing a definition for reliable. 
Networking stacks nearly always have stochastic delays due to the various 
context switches and scheduling issues with transferring data to and from a 
user program and the actual network hardware. On the USRP side the FPGA 
provides a much more deterministic behavior because the logic is exclusively 
serving the network traffic. The DRAM buffer on the transmit side is there to 
absorb some of the variability of the host computer network stack, but it can 
only do that if there is enough time delay between samples being sent by the 
program and when the DAC must be producing the associated analog signal.
      
      
     In practice I have always used a few (5-20) ms and found it to be reliable 
for transmissions lasting up to an hour, but you will have to test your 
specific setup. Different OS network stacks have different options for tuning 
to reduce both the average and peak latency of the network drivers. I'm not an 
expert in them but there are a variety of good resources online. In 
applications demanding both small latency and high reliability moving to a 
realtime Linux environment can help in meeting those hard deadlines. I believe 
that some of the LTE and GSM projects have been successful with that approach.
     
     
    Regards,
    
   Derek
   
  
  
   
   
    On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Hojoon Yang via USRP-users 
    <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
    
    
     Hi,
     
     I am using USRP X310 with two UBX-160 daughterboards.
     
     In my application, I am using timed transmission, for example,
     
     start transmission at (usrp_get_time_now() + delta)
     
     My question is, what is the smallest delta value that can be successful in 
the *real world*? Theoretically, the delta can be any value, if the host can 
send the packet to the USRP fast enough.
     
     Suppose we have a PC which have i7-8700k CPU and the PC only runs this 
application. when I set the delta 1ms, Can I avoid late 'L'?
     
     Best regards,
     Hojoon 
     
     ______________________________
     _________________
      USRP-users mailing list
      
     USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
      
     http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
      
     
    
   
   
   
 
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to