Just speculating, but I wonder if what you're seeing is a result of
quantization error...

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:55 PM Farhad via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:

> Thanks Ian for your answer; but my main question still remains unanswered
> which is why with different wire format sc8 and sc16 the spectrum is
> different? How may I interpret  this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Jun 25, 2018, at 9:44 PM, Ian Buckley <i...@ionconcepts.com> wrote:
>
> On a USRP2 thats a harmonic of the on-board 100MHz clock. One excellent
> way to deduce when you are dealing with a spur thats LO related is to use
> offset tuning to move the LO relative to the center of your band of
> interest.
> See: https://files.ettus.com/manual/structuhd_1_1tune__request__t.html
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Farhad Mirkazemi via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I attached the two spectrum snapshots with no antenna connected (which
> means what I'm seeing is just pure noise?)to usrp2 setting the center
> frequency at 1590 MHz, one using sc16, fs 25 MHz and the other sc8
> wireformat fs 50 MHz; regardless of the spike at 1600 MHz (10 MHz off the
> fc) which I don't know why it shows up on both spectrum (I can interpret
> the spike at the center frequency as dc component but don't know about this
> one); so it looks like for the sc8 the spectrum has been folded around
> center frequency where for sc16 wireformat it looks normal. can you please
> explain why is that and how to fix this?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, June 22, 2018, 5:52:23 PM EDT, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/22/2018 05:43 PM, Farhad Mirkazemi via USRP-users wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm recording RF signal at 1.5 GHz using usrp2 with wbx daughterboard of
> fixed BW of 40 MHz; since I'm interested to capture the whole BW, I set the
> over-the-wire format to sc8 to be able to have 50 MSps rate; as example
> rx_samples_to_file suggests, there is no "byte" or "char" format to store 8
> bit IQ samples; now, if I use "short" type and try to read my binary file
> using matlab, for example, and use the same "int16" format as I was doing
> for SC16 wireformat, i.e interpreting it as I1, Q1, I2, Q2 ..... using
> "int16" reading format, the spectrum looks not the way it should. I know
> it also has to do with the host cpu format which in my case it is 64 bit
> processor but I don't know how to manage the transformation between the
> host and the packet router. Can some please explain how it works and if
> possible how to interpret the data on platform other than uhd? it is also
> appreciated if explain how I could store using 8 bit format so that the
> file size be reduced to half.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> You may need to tweak the dynamic range in the device arguments, using
> "peak=0.01" or even "peak=0.001", depending on hows strong your
>   signal is.
>
> Also, could you describe what you mean by "not what it should be" ??
> That's a little vague.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
> <Screenshot from 2018-06-25 17-58-12.png><Screenshot from 2018-06-25
> 18-00-34.png>_______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
-- 
Very Respectfully,

Dan CaJacob
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to