Hello Adams, Yes, the TwinRX Rev A and B work with RFNoC, but the rfnoc-devel branch may currently have some regressions. We are in the process of updating the rfnoc-devel branch with many changes from the master branch including support for the TwinRX Rev C. We will be doing regression testing of the rfnoc-devel branch with all revisions of the TwinRX next week. I do not know the timeline for pushing the updated rfnoc-devel branch to the public repository, but I believe that it will be shortly after the testing.
Regards, Derek On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Adams, Andrew L. via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > We are currently using a TwinRX daughterboard on a X310 USRP. We have had > little success using rfnoc-devel branches of UHD (software and FPGA > repositories) with the TwinRX card. Using the latest rfnoc-devel code, the > TwinRX card only works (i.e., we see our signal coming from the radio) > about 10-20% of the time. When it doesn’t work, the flowgraph continues to > run as if nothing is wrong, but there is no signal present (I/Q samples > don’t seem valid; they are very close to zero). This issue can also be > reproduced with the simplest flowgraph. This issue led us to believe that > it is an incompatibility issue between the hardware and the latest > rfnoc-devel version. Therefore, we began experimenting with the formal > release of UHD: 3.10.3. The daughterboard appears to function correctly > with the 3.10.3 release. Is the TwinRX daughterboard supported by RFNOC? > > > > Andrew Adams > > > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
