Dear Seah,

no, we really can't, since we don't understand what you're doing.

Please deliver an overview of what you are trying to implement. In my
experience, a drawing (just a quick drawing on a piece of paper will
do!) is often very, very helpful at illustrating complex systems like
what you seem to be doing.

Best regards,

Marcus


On 10/04/2017 12:02 AM, seah chong wrote:
> hi, could you suggest any coding  to implement a full protocol and
> handshaking between the USRP N210.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Leandro Echevarría
> <leoechevar...@gmail.com <mailto:leoechevar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Seah, are you saying that you're trying to get a wireless link
>     working between both USRP devices? If that is the case, and you
>     are not implementing a full protocol and handshaking between them
>     in the RF domain, they will not behave as intended (i.e., as a
>     pair of wireless CPEs, such as Ubiquiti Nanostations, to give an
>     example).
>
>     On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:59 AM Marcus Müller via USRP-users
>     <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Sorry, I still don't understand – what circle are we talking
>         about?
>
>
>         On 03.10.2017 06:50, seah chong wrote:
>>         sorry about that, the coverage networking is weak. IP Address
>>         PC A is 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0. what i means with
>>         Omnidirectional is actually the communication between
>>         the USRP  is propagate within the circle.
>>
>>         On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:31 AM, seah chong
>>         <seahchon...@gmail.com <mailto:seahchon...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             hi
>>             the computer connected to the device of USRP N210 using
>>             Communication System Toolbox Support Packages. the
>>             device  connected using the ethernet Cable. The first and
>>             second  USRP will communicate within omnidirectional.
>>
>>
>>             />*> findsdru
>>             Checking radio connections...
>>
>>             ans =
>>
>>                  Platform: 'N200/N210/USRP2'
>>                 IPAddress: '192.168.10.2'
>>                 SerialNum: 'F5E4FF'*/*
>>                    Status: 'Success'*
>>              
>>             Both USRP N210 are successfully connected to the PC but
>>             unable to communicate to each other.
>>             I also try ip route get
>>
>>             */root@seah-Precision-T1700:~# ip route get 192.168.20.2
>>             192.168.20.2 via 20.20.20.20 dev wlan1  src 20.20.20.103
>>                 cache
>>             root@seah-Precision-T1700:~# ip route add 192.168.20.2
>>             via 20.20.20.20/*
>>             *
>>             //*
>>             */root@seah-Precision-T1700:~# route -n
>>             Kernel IP routing table
>>             Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags
>>             Metric Ref    Use Iface
>>             0.0.0.0         20.20.20.20     0.0.0.0         UG   
>>             0      0        0 wlan1
>>             20.20.20.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U    
>>             9      0        0 wlan1
>>             192.168.10.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U    
>>             0      0        0 eth0
>>             192.168.20.2    20.20.20.20     255.255.255.255 UGH  
>>             0      0        0 wlan1
>>             /*
>>             *
>>             //*
>>             */root@seah-Precision-T1700:~# ping 192.168.20.2
>>             PING 192.168.20.2 (192.168.20.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>             ^C
>>             --- 192.168.20.2 ping statistics ---
>>             17 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss,
>>             time 16128ms
>>
>>             root@seah-Precision-T1700:~# ping 20.20.20.20
>>             PING 20.20.20.20 (20.20.20.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>             64 bytes from /**/20.20.20.20/* <http://20.20.20.20/>*/:
>>             icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=149 ms
>>             64 bytes from /**/20.20.20.20/* <http://20.20.20.20/>*/:
>>             icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=160 ms
>>             64 bytes from /**/20.20.20.20/* <http://20.20.20.20/>*/:
>>             icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.899 ms
>>             ^C
>>             --- 20.20.20.20 ping statistics ---
>>             4 packets transmitted, 3 received, 25% packet loss, time
>>             3002ms
>>             rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.899/103.625/160.323/72.769 ms/*
>>             *
>>             | I attach figure  how the computer connected. I hope
>>             someone can enlighten me and can give me the solutions.|
>>             *
>>             *||*
>>
>>             |Regards, |
>>
>>             |ChongSeah|
>>
>>
>>             
>> <https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=3bd8e0bae3&view=att&th=15ecbad4df75fc18&attid=0.1&disp=safe&realattid=f_j85c79vy0&zw>
>>
>>             On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:30 PM, seah chong
>>             <seahchon...@gmail.com <mailto:seahchon...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 hi
>>                 the computer connected to the device of USRP N210
>>                 using Communication System Toolbox Support Packages.
>>                 the device  connected using the ethernet Cable. The
>>                 first and second  USRP will communicate within
>>                 omnidirectional.
>>
>>
>>                 />*> findsdru
>>                 Checking radio connections...
>>
>>                 ans =
>>
>>                      Platform: 'N200/N210/USRP2'
>>                     IPAddress: '192.168.10.2'
>>                     SerialNum: 'F5E4FF'*/*
>>                        Status: 'Success'*
>>                  
>>                 Both USRP N210 are successfully connected to
>>                 the PC but unable to communicate to each other.
>>
>>                 *
>>                 |I hope someone can enlighten me and can give me the
>>                 solutions.|
>>                 ||*
>>
>>                 |Regards, |
>>
>>                 |ChongSeah|
>>
>>
>>                 On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Leandro Echevarría
>>                 <leoechevar...@gmail.com
>>                 <mailto:leoechevar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                     Hello ChongSeah,
>>
>>                     Can you explain a little more about what your
>>                     network configuration looks like? Maybe a drawing
>>                     of all the network interfaces with their
>>                     respective IPs and subnet masks may help us
>>                     understand the problem better. 
>>
>>                     How are the computers connected? And how are the
>>                     N210s connected to them?
>>
>>                     Regards, 
>>
>>                     Leo.
>>
>>                     On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:00 AM seah chong via
>>                     USRP-users <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
>>                     <mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                         hi all,
>>
>>                         i have two Pc with device USRP N210. At PC A
>>                         the IP address  "192.168.10.1 netmask
>>                         255.255.255.0 and at PC B  the IP address
>>                         "192.168.20.1 netmask 255.255.255.0.
>>                         i also route add at the PC A using ip route
>>                         add 192.168.20.0/24 <http://192.168.20.0/24>
>>                         via 192.168.10.2 and at the PC B using ip
>>                         route add 192.168.10.0/24
>>                         <http://192.168.10.0/24> via 192.168.20.2.But
>>                         i cannot ping to PC B and same too goes to PC A.
>>
>>
>>                         the error comes out like below
>>
>>                         /*root@seah-Precision-T1700:~# ping 192.168.20.2
>>                         PING 192.168.20.2 (192.168.20.2) 56(84) bytes
>>                         of data.
>>                         ^C
>>                         --- 192.168.20.2 ping statistics ---
>>                         3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100%
>>                         packet loss, time 2016ms*/
>>
>>                         |I hope someone can enlighten me and can give
>>                         me the solutions. |
>>
>>                         |Regards, |
>>
>>                         |ChongSeah |
>>
>>                         _______________________________________________
>>                         USRP-users mailing list
>>                         USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
>>                         <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>>                         
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>                         
>> <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         USRP-users mailing list
>         USRP-users@lists.ettus.com <mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
>         http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>         <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com>
>
>

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to