Hi Nick, OK, all clear now, thanks for the clarification.
Cheers, Mark. On 29 September 2017 at 16:04, Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. You can change the rate however you like. Not sure where you'd get > the suggestion of an intrinsic integer limitation. If you're using > axi_wrapper in simple mode you'll just be responsible for handling the AXI > stream and setting the tlast signal to delimit packets at reasonable > lengths. If you're handling headers yourself, you'll be responsible for the > above plus setting the CHDR header length field. > > Nick > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:05 AM Mark Luscombe via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Apparently the RFNoC infrastructure only supports blocks that have input >> to output rate changes of integer amounts? >> Is there any way to have a data output that flows through to subsequent >> blocks at unknown downsampled rates? >> >> Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> USRP-users mailing list >> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >> >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
