Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com> wrote:
Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner <jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com> wrote:
Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that they
are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
Fail.
Pid,
why /do/ the "static objects" links embedded in the login page get back to the
browser with a jsessionid appended ?
<c:url is a JSTL tag which encodes a link.
So in clear everyday English, for the benefit of the oppressed minority who does not speak
JSTL fluently, the fact of encoding this link in the page as "<c:url something..>" is the
reason why Tomcat (roughly speaking) modifies it to add the ";jessionid" bit, yes ?
And if one were to remove the "<c:url .." tag from those links, it wouldn't,
right ?
And if so, why did you say "Fail" above ?
(apart from the name-calling of the Dev team, which may have been a bit overdone, this
being Christmas and all)
As long as we're at it, are there any dire consequences in this case for removing the
"<c:url .." bit ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
