Well, you get what you pay for.  My GoDaddy account costs $6.99 per month
and I quickly found it inadequate for hosting serious Tomcat applications,
just for the reasons you listed: very unintuitive control panels, 1-day lag
in servlet (non)-deployment.

I'm canceling the hosting portion of my GoDaddy account as soon as I get my
old dell dimension 4600 ready for hosting my website :)

But the $0.99 per year .info domain name is a pretty sweet deal i think.

Basically, GoDaddy is a very affordable domain name retailer; their hosting
is a mickey mouse LAMP-shop. My 65 year old father has his website hosted on
GoDaddy, my dad isn't interested in enterprise-level web applications, he
just wants a website.  Thats what Godaddy's hosting is good for.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:44 AM, George Sexton <geor...@mhsoftware.com>wrote:

> I thought I'd write up my experiences trying to get a servlet
> application running on GoDaddy. Perhaps it will save someone else some
> pain.
>
> I have a Java Servlet calendar application. It's a stable app and I've
> got at least a thousand of running copies. I was attempting to install
> it on GoDaddy's shared Linux hosting service which runs Tomcat 5.0.27.
>
> Reading the documentation on their site, it looked like all I had to do
> was upload the WAR file and wait until 1:00 AM Arizona time and the
> application should be deployed. I did this and waited. The next day, I
> found the application had not deployed. A call to technical support
> revealed that I had to go to a certain corner of the hosting control
> panel and enable Java language support. I did that and waited until the
> next day.
>
> This is one of the problems with their shared hosting account. ANY
> change takes until the next day to take effect.
>
> The next day, I looked, and the WAR file had been exploded but my App
> didn't work. Since my App has a dependency on the database, I uploaded a
> simple JSP to test the DB Connection. It worked. Attempts to view the
> error logs failed.
>
> I called GoDaddy support. The technician told me I need to enable error
> logging. He walked me through the control panel and I enabled error
> logging. I waited until the next day.
>
> The application still didn't work. When I tried to view the error logs,
> I got nothing. Another call to technical support revealed that the error
> logs I had enabled would not actually contain any Tomcat log data.
>
> I had my call escalated to a manager. I explained to him the reason I
> knew my application was not working. I told him the login page was not
> available. His response was "Yeah, there's no file with that name." I
> told him that the URL was a virtual mapping created in the web.xml file.
> After literally an hour, they came back on-line and told me that they
> were going to open a trouble-ticket and call me back.
>
> Several hours later, I got an Email from support saying. "It doesn't
> work because there's no file with that name."
>
> At this point, I had a funny feeling. I created a simple WAR file with
> one servlet and a web.xml deployment descriptor. The deployment
> descriptor mapped three URLs to the servlet:
>
> /MapTest.xyz
> /MapTest.jsp
> /MapTest.html
>
> I waited until the next day. Sure enough, I could access MapTest.xyz,
> and MapTest.jsp. Attempts to access MapTest.html generated a 404 Not
> Found error. This explains why my application was not running. All my
> servlets are mapped into URLs with extension of .html. This was a design
> decision because customers generally want the maximum visibility to
> search engines.
>
> So, what I found is that GoDaddy.com does not pass all requests into the
> servlet container. It attempts to service as many requests with Apache
> first, and then only passes the non-mapped requests into Tomcat. There
> are some 50 file extensions GoDaddy co-opts including .css, .xml, and .js.
>
> This configuration actually causes their deployment of Tomcat to be
> non-compliant with the Servlet API version 2.3 specification. Section
> SRV.11.2.1 says that explicit mappings in the deployment descriptor must
> take precedence over implicit mappings. Taken as a SYSTEM, their
> deployment of Apache Tomcat is non-compliant.
>
> My feeling is that ANY request that maps to a deployed context must be
> passed to the servlet container. Clearly, they are not doing that.
>
> So, after all the effort, I get to tell the customer that my application
> will not work on their hosting account. Rats.
>
> In general, even if your application isn't using servlet mapping I can't
> recommend them. Since it takes until the next day before you can
> re-deploy a WAR file, and there are no Tomcat logs available, it would
> be a really rotten experience.
>
>
> --
> George Sexton
> MH Software, Inc.
> Voice: +1 303 438 9585
> URL:   http://www.mhsoftware.com/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to