On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Michael Peng < michael.p...@entrustdatacard.com> wrote:
> Do the changes make sense, and what would be the side effect ? In our > case, the "netInBuffer" could be full, i.e., postion = limit for large > data. Maybe the "netInBuffer" should not be cleared since "compact" would > reset the "netInBuffer", should it? > > The buffer is flipped after that and the NIO code is the same anyway, so the change doesn't make sense indeed as is. Rémy