Hi! I already did some testing. First of all, setting the connectiontimeout was not a good idea :) While the servers seems to be able to handle the same load, the load average went up.
It is very very interesting what you mention regarding mod_proxy being faster than mod_jk / mod_proxyAJP. So if I understood correctly, mod_proxy should be a much better option for a high traffic site? even with APACHE in front of it? I came across with article which is interesting. http://www.blakerobertson.com/devlog/2012/2/7/performance-comparison-mod_jk-vs-mod_proxy_ajp-for-apache-22.html Regardind http, we use APACHE since we have quite a lot of rules. We also use mod_deflate, mod_expires and other apache modules. -- View this message in context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/VERY-HIGH-TRAFFIC-TUNING-tp5019838p5019923.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
