I don't think I want to do that. Let Howard himself disclose that link to
you. He may kill me if I do that.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Jon Williams
<williams.jonat...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear Mr. FUD
>
> Kindly elucidate with a link to your "recent interview" with Mr. Ship.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > Don't listen to Thiago, he is just blowing hot air. Tapestry is no more
> > relevant, as can be seen in the article:
> >
> >
> http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/
> > .
> > As you may see, Tapestry is not mentioned anywhere in that article.
> > Tapestry is just dying, no matter what Thiago would say. Again, even
> Howard
> > doesn't use Tapestry in serious client projects anymore. It seems there
> are
> > only a handful ( 3 or so) of Tapestry jobs available worldwide and you
> have
> > to be a commiter like Thiago to be able to grab one. Stop wasting your
> time
> > on Tapestry. There are other smart frameworks out there. What about
> Vaadin,
> > GWT or Wicket? They all support mobile development very well.
> > Thiago, please stop misleading people. Tapestry is just dying a slow
> death.
> > Even Howard admitted that in a recent interview.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
> > thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:52:09 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >  You Tapestry aficionados are just some radicals who are blind to see
> the
> > >> reality.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Says the guys who loved to post about Wicket in a Tapestry mailing
> list .
> > > . . :D
> > >
> > >
> > >  Even Mr. Ship doesn't use Tapestry anymore in his projects.
> > >>
> > >
> > > [citation needed]
> > >
> > >
> > >  Stop being stupid and look around for a better alternative. Your
> > >> knowledge and experience about Tapestry won't land you a job anywhere.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Well, my current job I got exactly because of my Tapestry experience.
> And
> > > I got some offers from other places.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Tapestry is now only used on hobby projects at home.
> > >>
> > >
> > > [citation needed]
> > >
> > > Just for example, most respected English dictionary, Oxford English
> > > Dictionary, have its online versions written in Tapestry:
> > > http://oed.com. Just open the home page, see the sources and search
> for
> > > Tapestry.
> > >
> > > Right now I'm working on a Tapestry project.
> > >
> > >
> > >  As we're speaking now, Howard is happily coding Wicket on a client's
> > >> project.
> > >>
> > >
> > > [citation needed]
> > >
> > > Hey, another Wicket mention! There's got to be a drinking game about
> it.
> > :)
> > >
> > >
> > >  Leave this cult and
> > >> do something better with serious frameworks. Tapestry is dying an
> > >> inevitable death.
> > >>
> > >
> > > A library or framework dies when nobody is using it anymore. The
> traffic
> > > in this mailing list alone is proof that are people using it, not to
> > > mention the larger pool of people that use it but doesn't post in the
> > > mailing lists.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> > > Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
> > > http://machina.com.br
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to