On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:26:45 -0200, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Can someone clarify why would play! be better than tapestry in this test?
I guess only someone with play! internal architecture can tell you this
for sure. I also think that is probable that its usage of Netty
(https://netty.io/), which uses NIO and asynchronous IO, instead of
servlet containers (usually synchronous) is an important factor. I'm
playing with the idea of running Tapestry over Vert.X (http://vertx.io/),
but no code written yet.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
