"better to have static js" On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Tapestry5 is not an upgrade from Tapestry4. I know, the name makes that > confusing for sure, but it's a totally separate beast. > > I think that creating javascript template files has been discussed before, > and the current consensus is that it's better to have status js files and > pass in your configuration. > > > http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart/examples/javascript/reusable > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:41 AM, nhhockeyplayer nashua < > nhhockeypla...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> So whats so bad about keeping the T4 javascript support in t5? >> i thought it was pretty handy >> > > >
