Despite all of what you said I bet its still easier to take the library as 
opposed to duplicate all that effort.
Like orders of magnitude easier.
I am sure the author is willing to donate the code, if he didn't do so already.

On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We've also had a number of cases of committers coming on, dumping code
> (without tests or documentation), and disappearing. That causes a lot
> of havoc.  I'd prefer to have fewer features, better supported, than a
> large ecosystem of broken and abandoned code.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's not always as simple as that.
>> 
>> First, there is licensing; I can't just take a library; it has to be
>> properly granted to the ASF.
>> 
>> Second, I'm hesitant to take on code "from the wild"; ultimately, the
>> T5 committers (primarily myself) end up taking on the responsibility
>> for the code; t5conduit does not even include tests.
>> 
>> Further, more changes are likely needed as I've been changing some
>> APIs so that (specifically) it is possible to determine what
>> extensions map to JavaScript. So the code as is may not compile
>> against 5.4 since one key interface needed a new method.
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@aceinnovative.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Please consider t5conduit for inclusion into Tapestry.
>>> It already supports CoffeeScript and LessCSS
>>> No need to reinvent the wheel here.
>>> 
>>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The conversion from CoffeeScript to JavaScript occurs on the server.
>>>> 
>>>> The generated JavaScript is quite straight-forward for most cases.
>>>> 
>>>> CoffeeScript is more concise than JavaScript; it includes a couple of
>>>> higher-order features, such as really smart loops, and smarter
>>>> handling of function parameters; providing defaults, and handling
>>>> extra arguments nicely.
>>>> 
>>>> The -> and => syntax for defining functions is close to ideal for the
>>>> web, where you constantly introduce new functions.
>>>> 
>>>> Each module is automatically packaged up inside a hygienic function.
>>>> All variables are declared before being used.  CoffeeScript supports
>>>> variable interpolation inside strings.
>>>> 
>>>> However, if you want to replace a module (by contributing an override
>>>> to the ModuleManager service), you can write that module is JavaScript
>>>> or CoffeeScript.
>>>> 
>>>> In fact, I haven't actually added support for CoffeeScript to the
>>>> project; that will be a suggested add-on module that hasn't been
>>>> written. Currently, the build is responsible for compiling
>>>> CoffeeScript into JavaScript; what's getting packaged inside
>>>> tapestry-core.jar is JavaScript.
>>>> 
>>>> In the future, there will be a module that will detect the ".coffee"
>>>> file extension, and convert that to JavaScript as needed, at runtime.
>>>> 
>>>> Ive used CoffeeScript extensively over the last six months; I like it,
>>>> I like how my code looks, I think the code is easier to follow and
>>>> mantain.  Brendan Eich thinks so too ... he's adapting idea from
>>>> CoffeeScript (and from Python, and elsewhere) into the next-generation
>>>> version of JavaScript.
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
>>>> <thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:02:21 -0200, Paul Stanton <p...@mapshed.com.au>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> ok, our usage of the term 'monkey-patch' is where the misunderstanding 
>>>>>> is.
>>>>>> I mean, patch. not monkey-patch, in your definition.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's why I always told my students: use the right words, the right 
>>>>> names,
>>>>> the right terminologies all the times, because otherwise people won't
>>>>> understand you. :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Monkey-patching in JavaScript and other dynamic-typed languages has a very
>>>>> specific definition: changing some function by overriding it through code 
>>>>> in
>>>>> runtime. The source code is *not* changed. Patching, in the source code
>>>>> sense, is something completely different, because it doesn't occur in
>>>>> runtime, being done on the source itself. What you're doing is patching, 
>>>>> but
>>>>> not monkey-patching at all.
>>>>> 
>>>>> According to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_patch:
>>>>> 
>>>>> A monkey patch is a way to extend or modify the run-time code of dynamic
>>>>> languages without altering the original source code. This process has also
>>>>> been termed duck punching.[1]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regarding the gains of using CoffeeScript: I've never used it, so I cannot
>>>>> answer that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>>>> 
>>>> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>>>> 
>>>> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
>>>> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>>>> 
>>>> (971) 678-5210
>>>> http://howardlewisship.com
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>> 
>> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>> 
>> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
>> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>> 
>> (971) 678-5210
>> http://howardlewisship.com
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> 
> Creator of Apache Tapestry
> 
> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
> 
> (971) 678-5210
> http://howardlewisship.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to