>
> I agree this is an issue. Have you filled a JIRA for that? If not, please
> do it.

It's already done but I think I'm not labeling it correctly because it
hasn't had any activity since then.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1948

I think what you're really saying is not that Tapestry UI framework is
> immature, but that it doesn't have the same number of components
> out-of-the-box (not including the easily-added third-party modules) as
> Vaadin.

This is it :)

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:00:13 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  I was merely making a suggestion that tapestry would
>> adopt a mature UI framework for it's client part and focus on it's most
>> mature part so far which is the server side's.
>>
>
> Another argument against that: Tapestry, in my humble opinion, does have a
> mature UI framework. It's incredibly flexible, it's easy to use, it's very
> easy and quick to create new components, there's live class reloading of
> them, so your productivity is higher, it can handle both client-side and
> server-side. It isn't a small part of Tapestry. It's a very large part of
> it. The JavaScript part is having a large improvement being written now so
> it's easier to use and create your own components that use JavaScript.
> Replacing the Tapestry UI framework by another Java framework would be a
> huge waste of the time and effort put on it. In addition, there would a
> couple of upsides, but a lot of downsides.
>
> I think what you're really saying is not that Tapestry UI framework is
> immature, but that it doesn't have the same number of components
> out-of-the-box (not including the easily-added third-party modules) as
> Vaadin. Yes, this is a good argument for Vaadin against Tapestry, but it's
> just one.
>
> To be clear, I'm not against an integration of Vaadin with Tapestry. I'd
> love to see that implemented as a module. It would make it very easy to use
> both together and have the best of two worlds.
>
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>


-- 
*Regards,*
*Muhammad Gelbana
Java Developer*

Reply via email to