I'm feeling guilty for starting such a controversy subject about a framework I like ! I was merely making a suggestion that tapestry would adopt a mature UI framework for it's client part and focus on it's most mature part so far which is the server side's. But *Thiago* already replied to that using the silver bullet metaphor.
*@Thiago* > Which showstoppers have you met so far? I once needed to acquire spaces if entered in a text box from the client but text boxes returns null by default and providing a custom NullFieldStrategy implementation won't help because it doesn't provide the supplied input in the first place. Then I found that I need to override some form related service but I couldn't get it to work and as I said, time isn't always in my favor so I had to do something quick and use the request object it self and do some string parsing (to know the input field index and match it with it's group, as I had input fields grouped logically with each other) and parse the input manually. That's what I call learning something. Care to provide actual examples? > Otherwise, you fall in the "I can do X in Y way faster than in Z just > because I already know Y well and I have learned Z yet". You are perfectly correct I cannot argue with you about that but the learning curve isn't quite smooth. Obviously I've used the wrong words again, I mean the integration part, like > configuration files or whatever. Of course including a jar into my > classpath shouldn't be a problem. So your argument about components provided by Tapestry out-of-the-box don't > apply here. ;) I'm not sure what you mean *@Lenny* > http://code.google.com/p/flowlogix/issues/detail?id=30 > For easy IDE completions Should this apply to everything aspect including custom components, pages ? I've been using tapestry since 5.0.something and enjoyed almost every update since then and to see this framework even better I only hoped to see it's UI much better without having to integrate anything. But that point is discussed already. Thank you all for your contributions and explanations :) On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:11:48 -0300, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> > wrote: > > Issue created: >> http://code.google.com/p/**flowlogix/issues/detail?id=30<http://code.google.com/p/flowlogix/issues/detail?id=30> >> > > Nice! Thanks! Subscribed to get notifications about this issue. :) > > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- *Regards,* *Muhammad Gelbana Java Developer*
