Thanks Lenny. Yes, it's the wrong list but the discussion's likely
relevant to a number of other people as well. The most appropriate
list is Shiro users and incidentally, there was a discussion on the
same topic some time ago
(http://shiro-user.582556.n2.nabble.com/Using-Shiro-in-a-Web-EJB-environment-td3773528.html).
Your title says EJB container objects but mostly you seem to be
looking at securing the front-end servers. I've done stateful
(session-based) web services before and that'll work just fine using
exactly the same configuration and annotations. Stateless security
support was added/enhanced in shiro 1.2 trunk (with the release in
sight in the near future) - basically making it easier to configure
the framework (or some paths) so that each request is authenticated
and authorized separately. If you have a multi-tiered architecture
where your EJB container is running in a separate JVM, you'll have do
more integration work yourself, to maintain keys or some access tokens
to secure user requests / executions between multiple JVMs. There's no
standard way worked for it as one size rarely fits all. It's an
interesting topic nevertheless, and you should join the discussion on
Shiro users list (see http://shiro.apache.org/mailing-lists.html) to
keep up-to-date and make your opinions heard.

Kalle


On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> perhaps this is the wrong list to post this to, but
> tynamo list still doesn't work for me, and I may post this on the Shiro list 
> as well.
>
> I just started using tapestry-security, and it works great!
> My application is a Tapestry front-end to a bunch of EJBs, Web services, and 
> Rest objects.
> It runs in Glassfish 3.1, and J2EE 6 compliant.
>
> This application is on an intranet, and we need to secure it and put it out 
> on the internet.
>
> I was wondering if/how we can use the same T-Security/Shiro 
> configuration/annotation/etc.
> on the Jax-WS Web Services, and Jax-RS REST Web Services, it at all possible,
> with a minimum of fuss.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to