We've had EJB's running on a separate JVM (in fact, separate physcial
server) for years, with no performance problems. In fact, scalability
wise, it's been to our advantage. With unit tests, EJBs are as
testable as anything. In fact, I don't see a point in hosting EJBs
locally on the same JVM as the application.

But again, that's getting into politics. Every organisation is
different. All I meant to say is that we use JBoss 6 with Tapestry in
such a way that it runs our EJBs on a separate physcal server, while
Jetty runs our Tapestry app. Prior to Tapestry, we had Tomcat running
Struts, pretty much same setup except that application framework was
crap.

Adam

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
<thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 May 2011 18:34:18 -0300, Jabbar <aja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Adam,
>>
>> We've always used JBoss, it's the company standard. I could perhaps use
>> Glassfish or Jetty to host the application. The application works
>> perfectly
>> using the run jetty run eclipse plugin.
>
> What's the error message when you try to run the application in JBoss?
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and
> instructor
> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
> http://www.arsmachina.com.br
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to