Hi Adam, IMHO, I would think that if the web server is running in the same JVM as the EJB container, the performance could be drastically improved: no need for serialization, net work problem etc...
Also for testing purpose, if everything is in-process, then testing is really a pleasure. We have done with Jboss-Embedded / maven / anthill. The build is only sucessful if all tests passed. We used Jboss for years and it is quite robust. Well, the downside is the scalability : JVM memory may be limited on some platform and web application is really a memory hog. Thanks and Regards, Vu ________________________________ De : Adam Zimowski <zimowsk...@gmail.com> À : Tapestry users <users@tapestry.apache.org> Envoyé le : Jeudi 5 Mai 2011 22h34 Objet : Re : Tapestry 5.2.5 and jboss6 I'm not sure if our setup will be of any help but... We use JBoss 6 with Tapestry 5.2.5, but indirectly. What is your purpose for needing JBoss to power Tapestry? If it's for EJBs, we have a separate EJB server running our EJBs, and Jetty running Tapestry. We have an EJB module for Tapestry which sets up all the EJB proxies and we simply @Inject this and that for all service calls. Works beautifully. Adam On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Jabbar <aja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > Has anybody got tapestry 5.2.5 to work inside jboss 6? I've found various > mailing list messages for getting tapestery 5 to work with jboss 5.0.1, but > nothing conclusive for Jboss 6.0 > > Can anybody help or point me in the right direction? > > -- > Thanks > > A Jabbar Azam > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
