whoops, typo > in your testng.xml you can now add a tapestry.servlet-container parameter and choose between => "tomcat6" <= or "jetty7"
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfi...@gmail.com>wrote: > Just submitted a Tomcat6Runner which is a drop-in replacement for the > Jetty7Runner. > in your testng.xml you can now add a tapestry.servlet-container parameter > and choose between "tapestry6" or "jetty7" > > <suite name="Tapestry Core - Limited" annotations="1.5" verbose="2"> > <test name="Jetty 7 Integration Tests" enabled="true"> > <parameter name="tapestry.web-app-folder" value="src/test/app1"/> > <parameter name="tapestry.servlet-container" value="jetty7"/> > > <packages> > <package name="org.apache.tapestry5.integration.app1"/> > </packages> > </test> > > <!-- rerun the tests in tomcat --> > <test name="Tomcat 6 Integration Tests" enabled="true"> > <parameter name="tapestry.web-app-folder" value="src/test/app1"/> > <parameter name="tapestry.servlet-container" value="tomcat6"/> > > <packages> > <package name="org.apache.tapestry5.integration.app1"/> > </packages> > </test> > > </suite> > > Josh > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfi...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Is anyone using arquillian? >> >> >> http://docs.jboss.org/arquillian/reference/latest/en-US/html/containers.html >> >> It seems to promise easy testing across containers. It's an alpha project, >> but if we could get the highest priority containers working for the base >> Tapestry unit tests that seems like a big win. >> >> I've spent some time getting embedded Tomcat to work and it hasn't been a >> pleasant experience... >> >> Josh >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Kalle Korhonen < >> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Oh, it's absolutely possible. This article is from 2002: >>> http://onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/04/03/tomcat.html. I swear I had >>> done embedding Tomcat for one of my projects, but for the life of me I >>> can't remember which one and I couldn't find the code :( It's a bit >>> more complicated than with Jetty, but I recall thinking at the time it >>> wasn't too bad. I'm sure it's become easier with the new versions. >>> >>> Kalle >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Igor Drobiazko >>> <igor.drobia...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Is it possible to start an embedded tomcat without to provide the >>> > installation path? The nice thing about JettyStarter is that jetty is >>> > "built-in". >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfi...@gmail.com >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> Most likely, seems like to the easiest way to go since most of >>> Tapestry's >>> >> integration tests are already done via selenium... selenium is just >>> the >>> >> browser tool though, I'm more interested in the app server. I plan to >>> make >>> >> it possible to configure which app server you run your integration >>> tests >>> >> in, >>> >> I was hoping someone had some prior art to build from. >>> >> On Jan 16, 2011 9:57 PM, "Werner Keil" <werner.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > Guess you're using the T5 enabled extensions to Selenium for that? >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Best regards, >>> > >>> > Igor Drobiazko >>> > http://tapestry5.de >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >> >
