Just submitted a Tomcat6Runner which is a drop-in replacement for the
Jetty7Runner.
in your testng.xml you can now add a tapestry.servlet-container parameter
and choose between "tapestry6" or "jetty7"
<suite name="Tapestry Core - Limited" annotations="1.5" verbose="2">
<test name="Jetty 7 Integration Tests" enabled="true">
<parameter name="tapestry.web-app-folder" value="src/test/app1"/>
<parameter name="tapestry.servlet-container" value="jetty7"/>
<packages>
<package name="org.apache.tapestry5.integration.app1"/>
</packages>
</test>
<!-- rerun the tests in tomcat -->
<test name="Tomcat 6 Integration Tests" enabled="true">
<parameter name="tapestry.web-app-folder" value="src/test/app1"/>
<parameter name="tapestry.servlet-container" value="tomcat6"/>
<packages>
<package name="org.apache.tapestry5.integration.app1"/>
</packages>
</test>
</suite>
Josh
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Is anyone using arquillian?
>
>
> http://docs.jboss.org/arquillian/reference/latest/en-US/html/containers.html
>
> It seems to promise easy testing across containers. It's an alpha project,
> but if we could get the highest priority containers working for the base
> Tapestry unit tests that seems like a big win.
>
> I've spent some time getting embedded Tomcat to work and it hasn't been a
> pleasant experience...
>
> Josh
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Kalle Korhonen <
> kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oh, it's absolutely possible. This article is from 2002:
>> http://onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/04/03/tomcat.html. I swear I had
>> done embedding Tomcat for one of my projects, but for the life of me I
>> can't remember which one and I couldn't find the code :( It's a bit
>> more complicated than with Jetty, but I recall thinking at the time it
>> wasn't too bad. I'm sure it's become easier with the new versions.
>>
>> Kalle
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Igor Drobiazko
>> <igor.drobia...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Is it possible to start an embedded tomcat without to provide the
>> > installation path? The nice thing about JettyStarter is that jetty is
>> > "built-in".
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfi...@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Most likely, seems like to the easiest way to go since most of
>> Tapestry's
>> >> integration tests are already done via selenium... selenium is just the
>> >> browser tool though, I'm more interested in the app server. I plan to
>> make
>> >> it possible to configure which app server you run your integration
>> tests
>> >> in,
>> >> I was hoping someone had some prior art to build from.
>> >> On Jan 16, 2011 9:57 PM, "Werner Keil" <werner.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Guess you're using the T5 enabled extensions to Selenium for that?
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Igor Drobiazko
>> > http://tapestry5.de
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>
