Nope, it works for me. On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Ivano Luberti <lube...@archicoop.it>wrote:
> Oh yes! I can remember about that: but the link is not working, the web > site seems down > > Il 24/11/2010 10.27, Igor Drobiazko ha scritto: > > Maybe this presentation will be interesting for the jsf developer. > > > > > http://blog.tapestry5.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/JSF-2.0-vs-Tapestry-5.pdf > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Ivano Luberti <lube...@archicoop.it > >wrote: > > > >> I forward to the list what a jsf developer has written to me: I'm > >> working with him on a project where he has to develop the web > >> application and I'm working on a web service consumed by his web > >> application. > >> > >> I had forwarded to him a message by Thiago that was trying to point out > >> differences between T5 and JSF. > >> The interesting thing he has to say is about facelets as a way to use > >> standard XHTML templates inside JSF. > >> Also the difficulty to use together different component sets is > >> interesting: reminds me of the issue with different JavaScript > >> components in T5. > >> > >> But what really surprises me is the similarity he found between struts > >> and JSF > >> > >> > >> -------- Messaggio originale -------- > >> > >> Hi Ivano, > >> > >> We do indeed use JSF for our web development and more specifically we > >> use Icefaces which is a set of AJAX enabled components and AJAX push > >> framework which sits on top of JSF. We chose to use JSF because it > >> wasn't too dissimilar from Struts which we were using before. Generally > >> we find it very good although it does have some shortcomings but they > >> don't tend to get in the way too much. We are using JSF 1.2 but JSF 2.0 > >> is now available and adds support for some of the things on your list > >> such as, you can now use annotations for lots of things you use to have > >> to use XML for, there is also the addition of page level scope as per > >> the tapestry idea. One point the tapestry guy is wrong about though is > >> that with JSF you don't have to use JSP, that is only one option. We use > >> facelets which is now part of the JSF 2.0 spec so if you use that you > >> code directly in XHTML using the relevant faces tags, thus the problems > >> that came from using JSP as a display layer disappear. > >> > >> With JSF you get a choice of which component set you want to use, or I > >> believe you can use multiple but then configuration becomes more > >> challenging. We looked at a number including Richfaces and Woodstock and > >> decided that Icefaces offered the best set of components. All three of > >> those are open source though so are completely free to use, although > >> support is available too. > >> > >> Unfortunately I don't know a great deal about tapestry so I can't really > >> say how it compares to JSF, I think you'd have to evaluate them both and > >> decide which one is easier for you to work with based on your previous > >> experience. > >> > >> Hope that helps, > >> Darren > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > -- > ================================================== > dott. Ivano Mario Luberti > Archimede Informatica societa' cooperativa a r. l. > Sede Operativa > Via Gereschi 36 - 56126- Pisa > tel.: +39-050- 580959 > tel/fax: +39-050-9711344 > web: www.archicoop.it > ================================================== > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
