I don't think this is a good idea. I understand that it would satisfy a lot of curiosity. Not that it could phone home on the networks I deal with. There would have to be value-add for the end user, such as checking for a newer version, etc.
Is there precedent for this in other Apache projects? On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: > This came up during my training class this week. > > What would be the repercussions if Tapestry included a start-up filter > that "reported" the application startup back to some central location, > so that we could get some idea of where and how Tapestry is being > used? Obviously, this would be documented, in such a way that it > would be easy to turn off for the privacy-minded. > > It would be interesting to know how many apps are running in the wild, > and details about how many pages & components & services, JVM > version, and OS and hardware configuration. > > Asking people to do this manually is a non-starter, I'm constantly > surprised by people telling me they are using Tapestry in visible > places. > > Thoughts? > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Alessio Gambi <agamb...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:18 AM > Subject: Re: Monitoring/statistics > To: Tapestry users <users@tapestry.apache.org> > > > Hi, > Please think also about some way to obtain (meta) statistics about > Tapestry itself. Something that can be used to track how many people > are actually using tapestry as platform for their applications. > > -- Alessio > > On 11-ott-2010, at 18:05, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've been thinking about this kind of thing as well; having a JMX bean >> for each Page instance and tracking number of render requests, number >> of event requests, number of ajax even requests, and ellapsed >> processing time for each. >> >> Obviously, it's a bit late for 5.2 ... it may be time to cut a 5.3 dev >> branch off the current 5.2 code base. >> >> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Josh Canfield <joshcanfi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I'm thinking about rolling my own generic monitoring/statistics solution for >>> tapestry 5 and I figured I should see if something is out there already >>> before I spent too much time on it. >>> >>> This is to be used in production and connected to an external monitoring >>> system, probably via JMX, but we might be flexible. >>> >>> Anything come to mind? >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Howard M. Lewis Ship >> >> Creator of Apache Tapestry >> >> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to >> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! >> >> (971) 678-5210 >> http://howardlewisship.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! > > (971) 678-5210 > http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
