On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:34:41 -0300, Markus Joschko
<markus.josc...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am not sure what Howard earns a year. But I guess if you divide that
amount by 100$ (the amount clojure asks for per developer) you come up
with a
rather large number.
And how many dedicated tapestry shops are out there that will contribute
more?
Now we've hit a problem which I can't give a good solution: measuring how
many people and how many companies are using Tapestry. Or any other
software tool. Any ideas? :)
I didn't know about the Closure funding. It seems a good approach. It
could even help us to know how many people use Tapestry, at least the ones
who don't bother donating a small amount to a project that improves Web
app writing productivity. I would love to work part- of full-time
developing Tapestry itself. It makes me sad to have contributed so little
to Tapestry until now.
Maybe technical supporters was the wrong term. Say developers.
I would say users. Developers may sound like committers (the people who
not only use, but also develop the framework itself).
I just wanted to make the point
that a technical framework is probably rarely supported from the
busines side but rather by enthusiastic developers.
I agree with you. On the other hand, having enthusiastic users is a very
good thing.
Point taken and thanks for the explanations. :)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, software architect and developer, Ars Machina Tecnologia da
Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
