Hi! very interesting thread. I use T5 since 1 year aprox, and it's true that T-IOC was the first "wall" I had, now I understand it and I like it a lot (my system does NOT use spring, all with t-ioc). I don't know which is the solution, because there is documentation about t-ioc, but maybe more documentation? or maybe a demo-project that uses basic t-ioc. I think is easier seeing something working, than reading t-ioc documentation and start from scratch.
Another point.. I think it's impossible to use T5 without t-ioc, is this right? If it's possible, it would be a good idea uploading another demo-project without t-ioc. What else? js.. prototype-based, I know it's possible to have prototype+jquery together, but I can see lot of people heading jquery, so I have a long-term plan.. make a tapestry.js based on jquery, if I do it obviously I'll share it. But "the solution" for this would be a tapestry.js agnostic, so people can "inject" their favourite framework. So, maybe it could be shipped with a default prototype injection, but anyone could write a mootols injection, jquery injection, etc etc Last, it would be good more components (ui components). I think I have no more suggestions On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:37:24 -0200, Piero Sartini <li...@pierosartini.de> > escreveu: > >> For me, authentication is an important part of a web framework and >> should provide some standard way to do so. > > Wicket itself doesn't. Nor does JSF. (all this as far as I know and I google > it) > > There is a third-party package for Wicket: > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security. > > For Tapestry, there's ChenilleKit Access: > http://www.chenillekit.org/chenillekit-access/ > >> Great! Really looking forward to this. > > Me too. :) > >> JDO on the other >> hand does - it was designed from the ground up to support different >> types of persistence engines. > > I never paid attention to JDO. Wouldn't be the case case as JPA regarding > use of low-level APIs? > > Regarding JDO, its implementations need for class enhancement after > compilation is something very annoying. Am I right? > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and > instructor > Owner, software architect and developer, Ars Machina Tecnologia da > Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
