On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Norman Franke<nor...@myasd.com> wrote: > FWIW, I'm quite happy with Prototype.
Me too! > I'd vote we use developer cycles for > something more productive than dealing with library preferences. They are > largely functionally equivalent and prototype support is already done. The point here is that the people who want or need Tapestry without using Prototype are the ones that will write and contribute the code, not the (current) committers. Open source as its best: the people who want some feature in a project, instead of just asking for it, will develop and contribute it. :) -- Thiago --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
