FWIW, I'm quite happy with Prototype. I'd vote we use developer cycles
for something more productive than dealing with library preferences.
They are largely functionally equivalent and prototype support is
already done.
Norman Franke
Answering Service for Directors, Inc.
www.myasd.com
On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Blower, Andy wrote:
That sounds fine, I would be more bothered if it was to take up a
massive amount of Howards' time meaning that he had less time to
push Tapestry forward in other areas.
Look forward to seeing what you come up with and I hope you enjoy
the challenge!
-----Original Message-----
From: Onno Scheffers [mailto:o...@piraya.nl]
Sent: 12 June 2009 10:15
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Switch from Prototype to jQuery?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Blower, Andy
<andy.blo...@proquest.co.uk>wrote:
I'd just like to echo everything Robert said in this message.
Hi Andy,
don't worry. I've read Roberts message and his concerns are valid.
I'm
aware
this whole thing won't be easy but it's not impossible.
Besides, if we keep ignoring the issue entirely, nothing happens. I
can
at
least try and see what I can come up with. Whether it works or not or
whether it ever ends up in the Tapestry production release doesn't
really
matter to me. It's an interesting project to dive into in my spare
time
:o)
regards,
Onno
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
