Inge Solvoll schrieb:
1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who
resisted, and why?
I am sure there a two things which could help at promotion for
convincing decision makers: Real big live sites running under tapestry
and a good up to date book.
2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your
programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation)
As bigger sites hardly start from scratch, I see the legacy reason as a
big technical point. Usually big codebases rely on action/command
focused frameworks (e.g. struts, spring mvc) and it is extremely hard to
refactor them to page and component based ones. Also I see that frontend
people are being used to work with JSP, freemarker etc. and are a bit
hesitating to look at "yet another" templating technology.
I really like tapestry concepts and helps a lot to think in different
directions even if you don't use it in daily job. About tap-ioc I really
like to java-code style injection and configuration instead for XML.
-
manuel aldana
ald...@gmx.de
software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
