Hi!

I have been reading the "beautiful" thread and added my opinion about what's
great about Tapestry. It's nice to sum up why we all are so excited about
this, it obviously makes both us and the creator(s) feel good about
ourselves. But for a little while, I challenge us all to stop tapping each
others' backs and go into depth about what's not to like about our beloved
framework.

The most obvious questions that could be asked probably have some very
obvious answers. But T5, as I see it, is all about addressing stuff that
other frameworks have given up on and create excellent implementations
rather than just looking the other way. Difficult and uncomfortable
questions should be addressed the same way.

So:

What are the main reasons that T5 isn't one of the "big ones", when we all
seem to agree that it is so much better than most other frameworks out
there? Why is T5 NOT beautiful?

Hope I'm not insulting anyone, I'm a big fan too, I just think this actually
could lead to significant insight :)

Regards

Inge

Reply via email to