Exactly!
In JIRA, you can display a "Votes" column whith which you can sort
issues by number of votes in descending order. I believe that those
ranking top have to be addressed first! That's what the users need!
Uli
Borut Bolčina schrieb:
IMHO creating more "high level" components and better documentation are the
things to spend time on, if not even crucial and certainly not switching JS
library just after the framework was released.
Regards,
Borut
2009/2/1 <farm...@linagora.com>
Whether or not one "likes" jQuery or not isn't the point. Tapestry is
built with prototype, and it works. That's the point. Were it built with
jQuery, I would have raised the same question if the suggestion of
switching to prototype had been brought up. It's not my preference
that's behind my resistance, it's the simple pragmatism of "if it ain't
broke don't fix it." On the other hand, the prospect of a pluggable JS
framework is interesting and I'm all for that. That is a feature; an
improvement. A wholesale switch from prototype to jQuery just doesn't
seem like time well-spent.
Can't agree more :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
