You pathetic troll. My challenge to you was just to show that you will
always avoid technical discussion because you're simply uneducated (if
you are educated, show us some proof - maybe we'll find out your true
identity), technically-challenged, loud & obnoxious spammer with
one-and-only agenda, to waste people's time. If I want the answer,
I'll get it right here, from people that actually know their stuff :)

heh,heh

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam,
>
>  Would you pay me after I give you the technical answers you desire? If yes,
>  then drop me a line off list and we could discuss rates, etc. Upon agreement
>  you'd receive high quality technical answers to your queries. Just keep note
>  that my services are not for free.
>
>  Regards,
>  Rob
>
>
>
>  On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Adam Zimowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  > A typical trollish Smeets, avoiding technical discussion. I will ask
>  > you again, since you seem to know SO MUCH about AOP:
>  >
>  > >You're bundling an AOP into T5 core- a mere webframework? This is insane.
>  > > Howard, Webframework is simple and it seems you keep on over-engineering
>  > > something this simple.
>  >
>  > So I ask YOU AGAIN Rob:
>  >
>  > I'm on 5.0.11 right now, and I need to advice my page methods. Could
>  > you help me with this? Can you tell me exactly how to do it with
>  > Spring AOP? Please, be technical enough so that I can implement this
>  > using your solution.
>  >
>  > Please, give me a specific technical answer.
>  >
>  > -adam
>  >
>  > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Christian Edward Gruber
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > You're being deliberately obtuse and Trollish, Rob.  You have been on
>  > this
>  > > list long enough to know that the IoC infrastructure is a separate
>  > > sub-project.  I use it in a framework of my own, completely independently
>  > of
>  > > the web-framework.  The AOP features are are used by the web framework,
>  > but
>  > > are part of the infrastructure.  And even if it was in the web framework,
>  > > it's not bloat given the nature and size of the implementation.
>  > >
>  > >  Go away.  All you do is complain without providing critique.  You have
>  > one
>  > > or two good "meta" critiques, and you have made them, most on this list
>  > have
>  > > agreed, and you never shut up about it.  You have an agenda, which should
>  > be
>  > > clear to all by a light reading of the history.
>  > >
>  > >  As to T5's releasability, I already have three clients using Tapestry in
>  > > apps nearing production.  It's stable enough for release, it merely
>  > doesn't
>  > > have all the features some people want for it to be "done enough".  It's
>  > > been "releasable quality" for two versions now, as my customers see it.
>  > > You might argue with it, but who the heck are you?  I'll go with my own
>  > and
>  > > my clients' architects analysis of T5 vs. other (yes even more "mature")
>  > > frameworks.  Do they have problems?  Yes.  But they have no more problems
>  > > than when they started using Struts back in the day.  Mostly they're not
>  > > problems of T5, but of understanding how to properly use the new
>  > framework
>  > > given their old habits and assumptions.  And they all agree that the
>  > > learning curve on T5 is way shorter.
>  > >
>  > >  Cheers,
>  > >  Christian.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  On 2-May-08, at 05:14 , Rob Smeets wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > > Howard,
>  > > >
>  > > > You're bundling an AOP into T5 core- a mere webframework? This is
>  > insane.
>  > > > Howard, Webframework is simple and it seems you keep on
>  > over-engineering
>  > > > something this simple. Well, when are you going to bundle a CORBA
>  > > > implementation?
>  > > > This guy is always coming up with an excuse not to release T5. By the
>  > time
>  > > > T5 goes final, maybe in 3 years, it'll be the biggest hairy beast we've
>  > > ever
>  > > > seen. This is all insanity to the power 64.
>  > > >
>  > > > Rob
>  > > >
>  > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > > I can't wait to see what you put together using the new method advice
>  > > > > support in 5.0.12; it makes doing interesting things with methods and
>  > > > > annotations much, much easier.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Geoff Callender
>  > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > Hi all,
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > JumpStart 3.6 is now available.  It's for Tapestry 5.0.11.  New in
>  > > this
>  > > > > > release:
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > >       * Wizards - 3 styles explored: with form fragments, with
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > components,
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > and with separate pages.
>  > > > > >       * Conversations - implemented in the wizards to handle the
>  > Back
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > and
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > Reload buttons and sessions shared by new windows.
>  > > > > >       * Conversations List - shows your conversations and lets you
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > jump to
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > them.
>  > > > > >       * Session Display - see what objects are in your session.
>  > > > > >       * Autocomplete Mixin - see it in action.
>  > > > > >       * The Select component - new and better examples.
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > You'll find JumpStart at:
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > >       http://files.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > The implementation of conversations is my own invention and has not
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > been
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > used in anger.  I'm sure it could be improved, eg. with
>  > annotations.
>  > > I
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > pray
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > that it doesn't have any holes in it, and I look forward to any
>  > > > > > contributions that will help it along.
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > As always, comments and suggestions are encouraged. Be helpful or
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > brutal -
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > I don't care which - because it all helps to make this stuff more
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > useful.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > Cheers,
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > Geoff Callender
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > > > --
>  > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship
>  > > > >
>  > > > > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
>  > > > >
>  > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to