Hi guys, I've been sitting in my nice and soft chair, this time with a chilled beer in my right hand, reading and enjoying this thread with really big LOLs. And I noticed also there is a page on the Tapestry 5 wiki devoted to my name. I have no problem with that at all. People who come across this page would surely follow through to what I've written and would judge for themselves.
My mission remains unchanged though. My mission is to pinpoint to newbies and the ignorants the history and the craziness going on with Tapestry's release cycles. Fanatics of Tapestry may claim it's fun to work with (at least until they try Wicket or GWT), which I personally disagree, but their joy would turn to grief, tears and sorrows when Tapestry 6 comes out. I want to tell newbies- if you work for a serious organisation, don't go with Tapestry. You may end up loosing your job. Howard claims he has trained 100 Tapestry users since Tapestry's inception 7 years ago. Yes, in 7 years he's been able to train only 100 people. I personally would expect 10 fold of that figure. That says a lot about Tapestry's adoption. So mister newbie, after reading this google some more about Tapestry and make your own mind. I personally would ask you to seriously look into other frameworks such as Wicket and GWT. Looking into Adobe Flex won't be a bad idea either, which I know Howard agrees with me. For a reference, check on his blog. Yours friendly, Rob On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless this guy has four names he's in violation of at least one Gmail > Program Policy: > > "Prohibited Actions > In addition to (and/or as some examples of) the violations described in > Section 3 of the Terms of Use, users may not: > > [...] > > * Impersonate another person (via the use of an email address or > otherwise) or otherwise misrepresent yourself or the source of any email > > [...] > > * Create multiple user accounts in connection with any violation of the > Agreement or create user accounts by automated means or under false or > fraudulent pretenses" > > I believe Hotmail etc. have similar policies. > > -Filip > > > On 2008-04-16 15:42, Davor Hrg wrote: > > > We did try many ways to deal wit this particular person, > > called him TROLL, tried asking real question, ignorring... etc. > > > > he was never for a real technical discussion, > > and this email account he uses is most likely an alias to hide his true > > identity. > > > > Reporting him to abuse admins is no violation of his freedom of speech > > because the administrators on gmail and hotmail will decide if this > > something that should be sanctioned, we only send our grievance to the > > abuse dept. The abuse admins will then decide if we are overreacting. > > > > Davor Hrg > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Andy Pahne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Chris Lewis schrieb: > > > > > > ... > > > > I will agree with you that he should be free to do so - but with > > > > _his_ > > > > resources, not ours. > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > Yeah, you (and Christian) convinced me about this "his megaphone" and > > > "our > > > megaphone" thing. > > > > > > <irony> > > > Time to get out my dung fork and start the hunting. > > > </irony> > > > > > > BTW: Tapestry rules. No troll could convince me of the opposite. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
