> I did not take the time to read all those troll's mailings, but > as long as the troll does not violate the personal rights of > anybody, all of his writings fall under the category "freedom > of speech". Opting to report abuse to google mail and others > seems to me like overreaction.
Well do you mean freedom more like free or more like doom? Well bad joke. But freedom of speech is overstretching here. Actually this news group is not public area but private property. You know this guy who we dont want to name (:-P) is like a person Opening your front door running around your own house and yelling Around. He is funny sure but once he steps on your feet twice you Wanna have him out of your booth. You know he came here. And here is a special place run by Howard And Friends Inc.! So this is our pub... . You know what I mean! :-) -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Andy Pahne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. April 2008 14:59 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: Trolls (Rob Smeets, Emmanuel Sowah, you know) To quote yourself: "In general, trolls can simply be ignored. In dealing with this particular troll, I have opted to start reporting him to the abuse departments of the networks from which he sends messages. If you feel compelled, I urge you to do the same in addition to ignoring him '''completely'''." I did not take the time to read all those troll's mailings, but as long as the troll does not violate the personal rights of anybody, all of his writings fall under the category "freedom of speech". Opting to report abuse to google mail and others seems to me like overreaction. Go with your own advice and ignore the trolls. Spare your energy for the really important things. Andy Chris Lewis schrieb: > I'm sorry, but have you read his messages? He intentionally writes > inflammatory messages, does not respond to questions or requests to > stop behaving so offensively, and it is highly probable that he is in > violation of the TOS for at least gmail and most likely also hotmail. > I don't care to know if users of the list make such violations, but > when someone is clearly using the list for abusive purposes, this > information becomes relevant (at least to me). > In addition, all of the information on that page was taken from > publicly accessible archives of public mailing lists. The names, email > addresses, and messages listed on that page are ones written by him > and posted to public lists. > Please, explain to me how repeating information that someone has > willingly published to public resources is in any way unethical. > > Joshua Jackson wrote: >> On 4/16/08, Chris Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> How is this not ethical? >>> >>> Joshua Jackson wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/16/08, Andy Pahne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Don't you think you are getting carried away with it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I think so too. I don't think this is ethical. :) >>>> >> Writing people's names and call them trolls. I don't think that is ethical. >> >> > -- Andy Pahne System Architektur & Software Design net22 GmbH Ehrenbergweg 24 32760 Detmold http://www.net22.de Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon +49 (5231) 58 06 40 Mobil +49 (174) 171 68 70 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
