You may run in to issues wrt hot class reloading, but maybe not. Only one way for you to find out. ;)
FYI - I was witness to at least a couple tiny email exchanges between Howard and Bob discussing their implementations and what kind of options there might be. The T5 IoC feature set is just too rich to be handled by Guice right now without a lot of work being done on the Guice side. ....Just didn't want people thinking that Howard just blindly does his own thing without collaborating with anyone. They both understand the issues involved and seem to sort of agree that things really do work a little differently in many areas. Maybe someday Guice will support all of the features T5 needs, but in the meantime it doesn't - so there's not really anything that can be done about it without a lot of re-write work being done in Guice. On Oct 30, 2007 12:45 PM, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please, please don't 'shoot' me - but if this is the case what would be > a reason for me to use T5 IoC, other that for injecting stuff into page > classes? > > Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:08:20 -0200, Jan Vissers > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A different question. If I would chose to use Guice as IoC and T5 IoC > >> simply as a bridge into Guice - which part(s) of T5 as a web app > >> framework would I be unable to use? > > > > AFAIK, none. Of course, Howard can answer this question better than > > me. :) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
