This is almost a FAQ. See the older post here:
http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/search?q=guice
Also see the "Why Not ..." sections:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-ioc/
Cheers,
Nick.
Jan Vissers wrote:
On the why of Guice...
Not trying to offend anyone here, but maybe T5 already could have been
finished if instead of writing yet another IoC framework the choice was
made to adopt an elegant one.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=563902125495823741
Bob Lee:
"If you want to know why Guice is so popular, the best advice I can give
is, try it. Who knows? You might decide to lobby for a couple new features
and adopt it, in which case you could spend more time on your web
framework."
Given the fact that Guice already had a major influence on T5, it is still
not quite clear to me why T5 IoC exists. But then again - I'm just a
simple developer waiting for the next great version of *the web
framework*.
-J.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:28:33 -0200, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Partially inspired by a question/some work by Leon Pennings (on this
list), partially because of my interest in Guice -
What exactly makes you interested in Guice? As far as I know (but I
haven't taken a look in Guice for some time already, so I can be wrong),
Tapestry-IoC does (almost) everything Guice does, but better. One of the
reasons is that T-IoC needs no annotations in your beans. :)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Desenvolvedor, Instrutor e Consultor de Tecnologia
Eteg Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.eteg.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
