Exactly - and to me T5 IoC looks/is very closely related to T5 the web application framework, whereas Guice seems more general purpose.
> Credit where credit is due: I've borrowed a lot of great ideas from Guice. > Initially, T5 IoC started as just a better HiveMind, but the influence of > Guice really pushed the envelope in a number of ways. Guice, coming in > new > and based on generics and annotations, had a large number of innovations. > > We disagree on a number of crucial ideas including certain aspects of > scope > and lifecycle, the need for service contributions (something none of the > other IoC containers seem to "get") ... but Guice pushes the spectrum of > finding matches based on type and annotations. > > On 10/29/07, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:28:33 -0200, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > Partially inspired by a question/some work by Leon Pennings (on this >> > list), partially because of my interest in Guice - >> >> What exactly makes you interested in Guice? As far as I know (but I >> haven't taken a look in Guice for some time already, so I can be wrong), >> Tapestry-IoC does (almost) everything Guice does, but better. One of the >> reasons is that T-IoC needs no annotations in your beans. :) >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> Desenvolvedor, Instrutor e Consultor de Tecnologia >> Eteg Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. >> http://www.eteg.com.br >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Partner and Senior Architect at Feature50 > > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
