If you need ajax, you can't go around 4.1 - if you don't, 4.0 has some advantages (as far as I can see) - such as much smaller javascript footprint for form validation, and stability -
However, Jesse does a great work in fixing bugs in 4.1 very fast, I go to sleep in Europe and Jesse fixes the bugs at day time in the states, so the next morning a new version is out - thats amazing ! It is not so easy to recommend anything in active development for production - I can just say - I am working on a project which should go in production on Jan 1st and am using 4.1 --- Cheers, Ron Cyrille37 wrote: > > Hi Jesse, > > You think we have to use the 4.1 vs. 4.0. > For example I'm learning Tapestry for a project which will really start > in january. > Will you tell me to use the 4.1 ? > > thanks > cyrille > > Jesse Kuhnert a écrit : >> I think it would reckless of me to recommend anything that may or may >> not affect anyone's job/career.. >> >> That being said - if it were me - yeah I'd totally go for it. >> >> It's probably been a mistake to wait so long for 4.1.1 to come out >> anyways. Probably I'll just fix this validation message issue and >> release it. >> >> On 12/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Okay, I know Jesse is probably fed up with these types of questions! >>> And we've gone over it before, about 4.1, 5.0, roadmaps, etc, a >>> couple weeks ago. >>> >>> The 4.1 "snapshot" that's out right now, for a relatively simple app >>> - no custom components, hivemind services, Java 1.4 so no >>> annotations, and maybe a sprinkle of DOJO stuff (hence the reason to >>> switch to 4.1!!) - would moving from 4.0 to 4.1 be a horrible idea? >>> >>> I skimmed over a lot of the open issues on JIRA and none seem too >>> severe, or too widespread to some of the "proven" core of tapestry. >>> Our application is for our internal staff (a dozen or so), and since >>> it's relatively small, is usually decently tested for bugs. So it's >>> not like I'm re-writing Amazon.com or something with Tap4.1 and will >>> lose billions of dollars over a bug.. >>> >>> 4.1 looks really nice, and it would be great to jump in, rather then >>> do it in 4.0 and then re-do it in 4.1 in 6 months. That said, go for >>> it? All comments apprieciated! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Greg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
