Hi, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Alex <mysqlstud...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> > wrote: >> Am 19.10.2017 um 16:50 schrieb Alex: >>> >>> My bayes is trained such that most marketing emails are bayes99. I've >>> also now removed mcsv.net from the whitelist and see it resulted in 70 >>> messages from mcsv.net being caught today, all of which were from >>> marketing@ or news@ or similar accounts from sites like >>> news@firma.agency >> >> well, your users will be grateful when you use a biased bayes and reject >> their subscribed newsletters - "bayes is trained such that most marketing >> emails are bayes99" is idiotic - the only question for traing is SPAM OR NOT >> SPAM and if you are not 100% sure don#t train a sample at all > > And yet, it would have stopped the email in question. It also relies > on other ham rules to subtract points or trusted senders to be > whitelisted. I'm also not convinced all of these are opt-in in the > first place.
Third day, third set of false-negatives (20 this time) whitelisted through mailchimp https://pastebin.com/6vkxNXxX I had removed the mcsv.net but forgot mcdlv.net. It's still not being tagged properly without the whitelisting.
