Double checked. Thank you for the correction. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/4_Content-Type.html
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > The purpose of SA is to flag > SPAM. Correct. > In this case, you already have all the information you need, > because > subtype specification is MANDATORY. There are no default subtypes. > ok. > SA must flag the email, because it is not compliant to RFC 822. Not > true. As has been said before, SA is not an RFC-compliance auditing tool. For > SA, RFC compliance checks are only useful insofar as non-compliance is an > indicator of spam. The omission of a MIME Content-Type may be a spam > indicator, or it may simply be an indicator of a sloppy MUA implementation > that takes advantage of Postel's principle. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ > http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a > jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 > B873 2E79 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Watch... Wallet... Gun... Knee... -- Denny Crane > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 > days until the 1938th anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii
