Ahh. Ok, perhaps I want to avoid them, then... :-D
----- Original Message ----- From: "Axb" <axb.li...@gmail.com> To: "SpamAssassin" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:42:08 PM Subject: Re: SoughtRules On 08/30/2016 07:32 AM, jdow wrote: > On 2016-08-29 17:51, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >> >> Am 30.08.2016 um 02:45 schrieb John Hardin: >>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Anthony Hoppe wrote: >>> >>>> I just learned about the sought ruleset via >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy. Is this ruleset >>>> still actively maintained? I'm considering implementing it in my >>>> environment, but want to make sure just in case. >>> >>> Sadly, no. I think it's been at least a couple of years since they were >>> regenerated >> >> but they still hit junkmails and are even part of the fedora default >> install >> pulled with the first "sa-update" >> >> rpm -q --file /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d/sought.conf >> spamassassin-3.4.1-9.fc24.x86_64 >> >> cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d/sought.conf >> # http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules >> CHANNELURL=sought.rules.yerp.org >> KEYID=6C6191E3 >> # Ignore everything below. >> return 0 >> > > > The late lamented SARE rule sets also work remarkably well if you > captured a suitable snapshot. > > {^_-} But some are a huge source of FPs... After SARE shutdown I dumped the last release (for posterity) https://sourceforge.net/p/sare/code/HEAD/tree/rules/DO-NOTUSE-rulesets-obsolete-/ be VERY carefull when playing with them - they are a huge 7 year old can of worms.
