Am 27.07.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 11.07.2016 um 13:47 schrieb Axb:<sigh>Bug 7156 Bug 7104 Bug 6896on Fedora 24 when that happens at the same time error like below appear in the maillog (perl-5.22.2-361.fc24.x86_64)
maybe better in context here:Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: Use of uninitialized value $4 in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 1042, <GEN88> line 202. Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: Use of uninitialized value $3 in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 1042, <GEN88> line 202. Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: Use of uninitialized value $2 in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 1042, <GEN88> line 202. Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: dns: new_dns_packet (domain=...(.sbl.spamhaus.org. type=A class=IN) failed: a domain name contains a null label Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: dns: new_dns_packet (domain=...(.zen.spamhaus.org. type=A class=IN) failed: a domain name contains a null label Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: Use of uninitialized value $4 in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 1042, <GEN88> line 202. Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: Use of uninitialized value $3 in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 1042, <GEN88> line 202. Jul 27 13:43:12 mail-gw spamd[9381]: Use of uninitialized value $2 in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 1042, <GEN88> line 202
On 07/11/2016 01:42 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 14:34:Am 11.07.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Jari Fredriksson:Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 11:52:Am 11.07.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jari Fredriksson:Define correctly, please."www..windstrom.at" is obvious wrong and was meant as "www.windstrom.at", so fix that typo in the background or just ignore the url at all since it CAN NOT become a positive dns responseI have been in this camp too as younger and wanting be user friendly. After that I have been impressed by a fellow talking about deterministic functions and that. Garbage in, garbage out. Invalid DNS name can not become positive dns response. Ever. Why should we change that somehow?because "we" are a score-based contentfilter and deal by definition with garbage all day long? so either recognize the garbage and don't send out invalid dns-requests at all or normalize it - in any case their is no point trigger hundrets of loglines with "a domain name contains a null label"Fair enough, and valid thinking. I was also thinking that if the resolver returns garbage that can not be used as scoring points for SA, when we have to handle this. But the resolver is not responsible for this, it should be SA task to identify invalid value and not even try to resolve it. And it just occurred to me that the SA discussion list is the right forum for it, and I have been a total fool. Please bear with me, I was lazy...10. heinäkuuta 2016 18.08.32 GMT+03:00 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> kirjoitti: Jul 8 10:00:40 mail-gw spamd[14221]: dns: new_dns_packet (domain=www..windstrom.at <http://windstrom.at>. type=A class=IN) failed: a domain name contains a null label i guess that was a typo in the mail itself - shouldn't SA replace such accidents (double dot) or at least recognize and ignore it so that dns/uribl looksups suceed corretly?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
