-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Reindl Harald kirjoitti 11.7.2016 11:52: > Am 11.07.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: >> Define correctly, please. > > "www..windstrom.at" is obvious wrong and was meant as > "www.windstrom.at", so fix that typo in the background or just ignore > the url at all since it CAN NOT become a positive dns response
I have been in this camp too as younger and wanting be user friendly. After that I have been impressed by a fellow talking about deterministic functions and that. Garbage in, garbage out. Invalid DNS name can not become positive dns response. Ever. Why should we change that somehow? br. jarif > >> 10. heinäkuuta 2016 18.08.32 GMT+03:00 Reindl Harald >> <h.rei...@thelounge.net> kirjoitti: >> >> Jul 8 10:00:40 mail-gw spamd[14221]: dns: new_dns_packet >> (domain=www..windstrom.at <http://windstrom.at>. type=A class=IN) >> failed: a domain name >> contains a null label >> >> i guess that was a typo in the mail itself - shouldn't SA replace such >> accidents (double dot) or at least recognize and ignore it so that >> dns/uribl looksups suceed corretly? - -- Jari Fredriksson Bitwell Oy +358 400 779 440 ja...@bitwell.biz https://www.bitwell.biz - cost effective hosting and security for ecommerce -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAleDgoYACgkQKL4IzOyjSrZrVgCgpaiC6NrEVrsoN/UBwqzXAW4N aicAoOH2mIYNlTSyxkYooPOhYwM5/C9e =R3M6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
