Am 31.05.2016 um 15:28 schrieb Antony Stone:
2. You should be aware (*especially* if using this stuff as the basis of a research project - any competent referee should pick up on something like this) that SA works best when the emails it is asked to process are from the same source as it has been trained with. In other words, you shovel real emails through a real mail server and train SA using this spam and ham; you then use that trains SA to assess mail passing through that same mail server, for the same users. Anything significantly varying from this is not going to work well, and is certainly not a good test of how well SA works.
not true - i heard similar nonsense about "you can't re-use you MX bayes database on a submission server" - i can, do and it works like a charm
our current corpus is 90000 mails large, conatins samples in many languages for many users (site-wide setup) and that bayes is shared with another company for more than a year now and has the same results there as here (96% hit quote)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
