That message is either a fabrication or something from a messed up system.
There's no sign of an IP address (neither IPv4 nor IPv6) in it.

There are two identical 'Received:' headers which have '()' where
there should be at least the IP address of the incoming connection.

This indicates that the message has either been tampered with or is from a postfix system that somebody has messed up the configuration.


On Mon, 30 May 2016, Shivram Krishnan wrote:

Hey guys,

I am testing spamassassin on a SPAM/HAM corpus of mails. Spamassassin is not 
picking up an obvious
spam like in this case http://pastebin.com/MbNRNFWy .

I have followed the guidelines on 
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy .

Let me know how to catch these type of Spams. It would be interesting to know 
what your spamassassin
assigns the score for this spam.

spamassassin assigned this score -

Content analysis details:   (3.9 points, -10.0 required)

       pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.4292]
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG  HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
 2.0 XPRIO                  Has X-Priority header



Notice that none of the  other body tags are triggered.

Thanks,

Shivram



--
Dave Funk                                  University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu>        College of Engineering
319/335-5751   FAX: 319/384-0549           1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin            Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{

Reply via email to