On Thu, 12 May 2016, Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2016, John Hardin wrote:
> 2. Is anyone interested in my current rule set of about 120 rules that
> target norwegian spam.
One thing to be aware of is publishing rules *can* reduce their
effectiveness, as that give spammers something to test and tune against.
They do read this list (at least the more-clueful ones do).
Good point, I might just leave them private for now. That might be why there
is so little about this online.
Making it known you have them available, and dealing with individual
requests, would probably be a good middle ground. Though, there's nothing
to prevent a Norwegian spammer who reads this list getting in contact with
you directly and asking for a copy under false pretenses... :)
Here's a question for you in return: would you be willing to contribute to
SA masscheck? The SA masscheck system is often hurting for corpa, and
pretty much always has insufficient non-English ham.
I'd be happy to contribute to the SAMC. I had a look at the wiki and it looks
fairly trivial to implement. I already have bayes filtering on spam/ham that
is handsorted by me. I'll send them an email.
Your participation would be *most* welcome!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The tree of freedom must be freshened from time to time
with the blood of tyrants and tyrannosaurs.
-- DW, commenting on the GM6 Lynx .50BMG bullpup
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
142 days since the first successful real return to launch site (SpaceX)
