On Thu, 12 May 2016, John Hardin wrote:
2. Is anyone interested in my current rule set of about 120 rules that
target norwegian spam.
One thing to be aware of is publishing rules *can* reduce their
effectiveness, as that give spammers something to test and tune against. They
do read this list (at least the more-clueful ones do).
Good point, I might just leave them private for now. That might be why
there is so little about this online.
Here's a question for you in return: would you be willing to contribute to SA
masscheck? The SA masscheck system is often hurting for corpa, and pretty
much always has insufficient non-English ham.
I'd be happy to contribute to the SAMC. I had a look at the wiki and it
looks fairly trivial to implement. I already have bayes filtering on
spam/ham that is handsorted by me. I'll send them an email.
--
Kim Roar Foldøy Hauge
Event:Presse - The Gathering 2016
webmas...@samfunnet.no
Root@HC,HX,JH,LZ,OT,P,VH
